China GDP per capita: Time required to catch up with the USA
Stephen
Chung
Managing Director
Zeppelin
Real Estate Analysis Limited
January
2006
Recent
news media reports indicated that China is now the 4th
largest economy in the world with its sheer size and fast economic
growth. Not a small feat by any standard and many expect, experts
included, China to continue growing notwithstanding the many challenges
along the way. This global economic position is based on overall GDP and
though the GDP per capita in China, based on data abstracted from
www.econstats.com, remains small at around US$1411, the 1.30 billion
population makes the total GDP a formidable figure.
While there
have been projections on when China GDP as a whole may become the largest
economy surpassing even the USA etc, there are few estimates on the GDP
per capita. Hence, your humble author has decided out of pure curiosity
to do a few simple calculations, noting the following:
1)
The
following are just calculations
= they are NOT projections, predictions, or estimates of future GDPs per
capita. They merely make some simple assumptions of GDP per capita growth
rates which are then applied to current GDPs per capita and spread over 100
years or so ahead. By so doing, a sense of how much is required to catch up
with the USA or other major economies could be obtained, though pardon us
for repeating, this by itself is NOT a confirmation that such growths are
guaranteed.
2)
The
assumptions are subjective
= as the calculation parameters and possibilities are infinite, your humble
author has to make subjective selections on the set of figures to be
applied. Essentially, China, as a developing economy and an emerging market,
is assumed to exhibit higher growth rates than the more mature USA economy,
and different levels of growth rates have been applied to give a sense of
possibilities. Naturally, the (starting off) current GDP per capita used in
the calculations are quite different, US$1411 for China and US$41917 for the
USA.
Shanghai
= this is included just for interest. Reportedly, the GDP per capita for
Shanghai is around 4 times that of China and thus a figure of US$5644 was
assumed. Obviously, Shanghai with a higher starting off figure will probably
take fewer years to reach a GDP per capita level comparable to that of the
USA. Admittedly, Shanghai could be compared to a counterpart metropolitan in
the USA yet this was not done for this exercise, in part because the USA
metro GDP per capita is unlikely to be 4 times the overall USA GDP per
capita.
And here
are the observations:
A)
USA GDP per
capita no growth at 0%, China 6%
= catch up year 2064 [note: the chart is good until year 2055 though
our calculations go up to year 2100]
B)
USA GDP per
capita no growth at 0%, China 8%
= catch up year 2050
C)
USA GDP per
capita no growth at 0%, China 10%
= catch up year 2041
D)
USA GDP per
capita no growth at 0%, China 12%
= catch up year 2035
E)
USA GDP per
capita no growth at 0%, Shanghai 6%
= catch up year 2040
F)
USA GDP per
capita no growth at 0%, Shanghai 8%
= catch up year 2032
G)
USA GDP per
capita no growth at 0%, Shanghai 10%
= catch up year 2027
H)
USA GDP per
capita no growth at 0%, Shanghai 12%
= catch up year 2023
I)
USA GDP per
capita at 2%, China 6%
= catch up year 2094
J)
USA GDP per
capita at 2%, China 8%
= catch up year 2065
K)
USA GDP per
capita at 2%, China 10%
= catch up year 2050
L)
USA GDP per
capita at 2%, China 12%
= catch up year 2042
M)
USA GDP per
capita at 2%, Shanghai 6%
= catch up year 2058
N)
USA GDP per
capita at 2%, Shanghai 8%
= catch up year 2041
O)
USA GDP per capita at 2%, Shanghai 10%
= catch up year 2032
P)
USA GDP per
capita at 2%, Shanghai 12%
= catch up year 2027
Further
technical notes:
1)
Straight
line growth rates for simplicityˇ¦s sake
= yet eventual / actual rates may vary for different periods and may even be
negative at times. There is no implied guarantee that economies, developed /
mature or developing / young, will only grow.
2)
No growth
scenario for the USA is used for illustration only
= and to give a sense of how long it may take to catch up even if the USA is
assumed to exhibit no further growth. This by itself is NOT an implication
that the USA will not grow in future (or will definitely grow for that
matter).
3)
China is
assumed to exhibit higher growth rates
= and a range of 6% to 12% is used, though actual future growth rates, if
any, may fall within or differ from this range. Nonetheless, 6% is not
unseen before in other economies e.g. the UK GDP per capita grew by 5.90%
per annum from 1980 to 2005 while the USA GDP per capita increase by around
5% per annum. Hong Kong GDP per capita also expanded in the same period
averaging around 6.10% per annum. While the foregoing offer no guarantees
that China will have at least a 6% or so growth rate for its GDP per capita,
they do show that 6% or so may be a reasonable expectation. In any event,
more optimistic growth rates have also been used here.
4)
Catching up
is faster
when China grows faster and / or the USA grows slower or not at all = and
vice versa, stating the obvious. Note also the possibility that Shanghai may
grow at a faster pace than that for overall China, though again this is not
a guarantee written in stone.
In summary,
a possibility is that assuming the USA is to grow at a much slower pace,
then China overall may catch up with the USAˇ¦s GDP per capita sometime in
the latter half of this (21st) century. Shanghai, on the other
hand, may do so sometime in the first half of this century. As GDP per
capita seems to exhibit some correlation to real estate prices, residential
ones in particular, Shanghai real estate is still probably one of the, if
not the, fastest investment markets (or asset classes) to reach a price
level comparable to that of the USA.
Notes:
The article and/or content contained herein are for general reference only
and are not meant to substitute for proper professional advice and/or due
diligence. The author(s) and Zeppelin, including its staff, associates,
consultants, executives and the like do not accept any responsibility or
liability for losses, damages, claims and the like arising out of the use or
reference to the content contained herein.
Back
to Home /
Back
to Simple to Read Stuff Section
|