Real Estate Prices Do Not
Appear Responsive Toward Taxes
Stephen Chung
Managing Director
Zeppelin
Real Estate Analysis Limited
January
2008
Quite a few jurisdictions
adopt various taxation measures to help guide (fire up or cool down) real
estate prices, residential ones in particular.
While reviewing some data on
global real estate prices, your humble author has out of curiosity done some
simple calculations with such price figures and their respective tax rates
including those on (rental) income and capital gain.
The short and simple answer
is that there appears to be no or little correlation between real estate
prices and their respective tax regimes
at least among the more than 100 markets being viewed. That is, markets with
comparatively higher real estate prices do not necessarily have
comparatively lower tax rates and vice versa. Here are some details:
A)
Data
sources = mainly
from Global Property Guide at
http://www.globalpropertyguide.com/ and the markets include almost all
continents and consist of both developed and developing economies-countries.
B)
Real estate
prices = are
expressed in terms of US$ per square meter of residential floor area and
correlations are done with (rental) income tax rates, capital gains tax
rates, and (round trip i.e. buy and eventually sell) real estate transaction
costs. While prices do have some form of negative relation to taxes and
costs as evidenced by the negative R values, their correlations are not
considered significant. Refer to the table below:
¡@
Correlations between: |
|
R |
R2 |
RE
US$/m2 |
Income Tax |
(0.15) |
0.02
|
RE
US$/m2 |
Cap
Gain Tax |
(0.00) |
0.00
|
RE
US$/m2 |
Transaction $ |
(0.05) |
0.00
|
C)
Real estate
rental income =
are expressed in terms of US$ per month and correlations are done with
(rental) income tax rates, capital gains tax rates, and real estate
transaction costs. The results are similar to those of prices and the
correlations are not overly significant. Refer to the table below:
Correlations between: |
|
R |
R2 |
Rent
per Month ($) |
Income Tax |
(0.27) |
0.07
|
Rent
per Month ($) |
Cap
Gain Tax |
(0.10) |
0.01
|
Rent
per Month ($) |
Transaction $ |
0.05
|
0.00
|
D)
Real estate
gross rental yields
= the annual rental income are expressed as a percentage of the prices and
these are correlated with the taxes and transactions costs as above. The
results are similar to those of rental income and the correlations are not
significant. Refer to the table below:
Correlations between: |
|
R |
R2 |
Income Tax |
Gross RE Yield |
0.20
|
0.04
|
Cap
Gain Tax |
Gross RE Yield |
0.05
|
0.00
|
Transaction $ |
Gross RE Yield |
(0.07) |
0.01
|
E)
Real estate
prices do correlate with rental income and to a lesser extent the rental
yield = higher
real estate prices (on a per floor area basis) generally do come by and
large hand in hand with higher rental income (on a per unit per month basis)
in the same direction, yet when rental income is substituted with gross
rental yield (as a percentage of prices), the correlation is not only
reduced but also goes in opposite direction. This implies while the more
expensive real estate do command higher rental income, their prices are
proportionately higher than the rental income they command thus compressing
their rental yields. Refer to the table below:
Correlations between: |
|
R |
R2 |
RE
US$/m2 |
Rent
per Month ($) |
0.70
|
0.50
|
RE
US$/m2 |
Gross RE Yield |
(0.45) |
0.20
|
F)
Between
income tax, capital gain tax, and transaction costs
= generally the two taxes correlate with one another in the same direction
but are in opposite direction when they are each compared to transaction
costs. Note however the correlations here are not very significant. Refer to
the table below:
Correlations between: |
|
R |
R2 |
Income Tax |
Cap
Gain Tax |
0.33
|
0.11
|
Income Tax |
Transaction $ |
(0.20) |
0.04
|
Cap
Gain Tax |
Transaction $ |
(0.25) |
0.06
|
Based on the foregoing rough
analysis, while it cannot be said
that administrative measures such as (rental) income tax, capital gain tax,
and transaction costs are totally ineffective, they do not appear to have
significant influence on (residential) real estate prices.
Admittedly, it could be
argued that an
individual market could see higher residential prices if not for its
relatively heavy taxes, granted that the markets herein are at different
stages of economic being, yet if these tax and transaction costs do exert a
significant influence on prices, a certain even if vague pattern showing
prices and taxes etc going in correlated opposing direction (i.e. high taxes
etc do keep prices in check) should become observable. This is not seen here
though further research is required to verify the rough observation and
hypothesis herein.
Or perhaps some other
measures could be
more effective in terms of price guidance, say metaphorically the water tap.
Notes:
The article and/or content contained herein are for general reference only
and are not meant to substitute for proper professional advice and/or due
diligence. The author(s) and Zeppelin, including its staff, associates,
consultants, executives and the like do not accept any responsibility or
liability for losses, damages, claims and the like arising out of the use or
reference to the content contained herein.
Back
to Home /
Back to Simple to Read Stuff
Section
|