China Residential: Scouting for Comparative Bargains via Average Prices per Floor Area
Stephen Chung
Managing Director
Zeppelin
Real Estate Analysis Limited
June 2007
(Based on
Data from Soufun - China Real Estate Index System CREIS)
We have been studying in
relative detail the macro real estate statistics provided by Soufun-CREIS
and have performed some basic calculations.
One such calculation involves a comparison of the average prices per floor
area (Yuan / m2, 1 m2 square meter = 10.76 ft2 square feet, and US$1.00 =
7.65 Yuan as of the date of writing this article) among nine 1st
and 2nd tier cities-markets. Using the Beijing average price per
floor area as base [=1.00], the average prices of the remaining cities are
compared to it. A figure higher than 1 means the city¡¦s average is above
Beijing¡¦s, while a figure lower than 1 means it is below Beijing¡¦s. The nine
cities are Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Tianjin, Chongqing, Wuhan,
Hangzhou, and Chengdu. Please note these average prices reflect mostly 1st
hand transactions:
China Residential: Beijing = 1 |
Year: |
|
|
|
|
Average Prices Yuan / m2 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
Beijing |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
Shanghai |
0.89 |
1.12 |
1.21 |
1.03 |
0.95 |
Guangzhou |
0.89 |
0.89 |
0.92 |
0.84 |
0.83 |
Shenzhen |
1.18 |
1.24 |
1.34 |
1.02 |
1.22 |
Tianjin |
0.54 |
0.55 |
0.62 |
0.67 |
0.63 |
Chongqing |
0.29 |
0.30 |
0.33 |
0.29 |
0.28 |
Wuhan |
0.43 |
0.45 |
0.52 |
0.47 |
0.48 |
Hangzhou |
0.72 |
0.82 |
0.82 |
0.77 |
0.81 |
Chengdu |
0.40 |
0.43 |
0.47 |
0.39 |
0.47 |
A few observations
can be made as follows (purely from the table above):
A)
Between
Beijing and Shanghai
= the latter may deserve some more attention as comparatively it seems to
harbor a bit of bargain potential, given its historic tendency to be higher
than Beijing¡¦s in recent times. This may have to do with the higher price
increase rate seen in Beijing in the last couple of years.
B)
Between
Guangzhou and Shenzhen
= the former appears to have some bargain potential as its ratio to
Beijing¡¦s is the lowest in recent times. This disparity with Shenzhen may be
due to Shenzhen being the city with the highest price increase rate in 2006
among the 1st tier cities.
C)
Among the 2nd
tier cities =
Chongqing may deserve some interest as its price level appears to be low
compared to the others. Nonetheless, this alone is not a sufficient reason
for investment and based on data seen, Chongqing harbors also one of the
highest supply growths.
Stating the obvious, the
above is based purely on the data presented above and technically this is
not sufficient for formulating a firm investment decision. Other factors and
analyses are required for more comprehensive consideration. Please also note
that the ratios in the above table can only tell if a city¡¦s average price
is higher or lower than that of Beijing during a particular time period i.e.
it does not automatically infer price rise or fall.
*For
details on these studies and data and how to subscribe to them, please
contact us.
Notes:
The article and/or content contained herein are for general reference only
and are not meant to substitute for proper professional advice and/or due
diligence. The author(s) and Zeppelin, including its staff, associates,
consultants, executives and the like do not accept any responsibility or
liability for losses, damages, claims and the like arising out of the use or
reference to the content contained herein.
Back
to Home /
Back to Simple to Read Stuff
Section
|