China Real Estate
Return: 1st Tier versus 2nd Tier
Stephen Chung
Managing Director
Zeppelin
Real Estate Analysis Limited
June
2008
(Based
on Data from Soufun: China Real Estate Index System CREIS)
In recent
years many real estate developers and investors, both local and overseas,
involved in the China real estate market have been reported to switch their
attention to or at least allocate more resources to the 2nd tier
cities in China. Reasons cited include the expensive and tighter land market
in the 1st tier cities and the emerging opportunities in the 2nd
tier ones.
It is not the
intention here to investigate or debate the pros and cons of such investment
preferences or the like. Instead your humble author out of curiosity has
assembled some simple price data and made some rough calculations to see if
indeed the 2nd tier cities hold more promise, return-wise, than
the 1st tier ones. Here are a few tables on prices per square
meter of floor area of various cities and sectors from 2006 to 2007 to begin
with:
Residential Yuan / m2 Floor Area |
2006 |
2007 |
Beijing |
7,375.41 |
10,661.00 |
Shanghai |
7,039.00 |
8,253.00 |
Guangzhou |
6,149.31 |
7,993.00 |
Shenzhen |
8,830.33 |
13,370.00 |
Tianjin |
4,649.25 |
5,557.00 |
Chongqing |
2,069.91 |
2,588.00 |
Wuhan |
3,548.55 |
4,516.00 |
Nanjing |
4,291.61 |
5,011.00 |
Hangzhou |
5,971.02 |
7,434.00 |
Chengdu |
3,436.84 |
4,190.00 |
Office
Yuan / m2 Floor Area |
2006 |
2007 |
Beijing |
13,554.71 |
15,152.00 |
Shanghai |
12,077.99 |
14,223.00 |
Guangzhou |
10,178.06 |
12,669.00 |
Shenzhen |
15,839.59 |
23,536.00 |
Tianjin |
6,170.54 |
7,411.00 |
Chongqing |
3,301.94 |
4,186.00 |
Wuhan |
4,494.93 |
5,705.00 |
Nanjing |
8,340.12 |
11,859.00 |
Hangzhou |
8,671.79 |
10,412.00 |
Chengdu |
4,579.20 |
5,828.00 |
Retail
Yuan / m2 Floor Area |
2006 |
2007 |
Beijing |
14,964.64 |
17,584.00 |
Shanghai |
6,479.00 |
6,613.00 |
Guangzhou |
10,218.84 |
9,525.00 |
Shenzhen |
14,292.70 |
19,099.00 |
Tianjin |
6,258.98 |
8,880.00 |
Chongqing |
4,552.87 |
5,135.00 |
Wuhan |
8,122.24 |
8,369.00 |
Nanjing |
7,025.19 |
8,468.00 |
Hangzhou |
8,817.37 |
9,498.00 |
Chengdu |
6,668.44 |
6,194.00 |
Using a
simple formula of ([2007 unit price ¡V 2006 unit price] / 2006 unit price)
for each city and sector, we would get a simple profit or loss percentage.
Here they are:
Residential % + / - |
2006 to
2007 |
Beijing |
45% |
Shanghai |
17% |
Guangzhou |
30% |
Shenzhen |
51% |
Tianjin |
20% |
Chongqing |
25% |
Wuhan |
27% |
Nanjing |
17% |
Hangzhou |
25% |
Chengdu |
22% |
Office
% + / - |
2006 to
2007 |
Beijing |
12% |
Shanghai |
18% |
Guangzhou |
24% |
Shenzhen |
49% |
Tianjin |
20% |
Chongqing |
27% |
Wuhan |
27% |
Nanjing |
42% |
Hangzhou |
20% |
Chengdu |
27% |
Retail
% + / - |
2006 to
2007 |
Beijing |
18% |
Shanghai |
2% |
Guangzhou |
-7% |
Shenzhen |
34% |
Tianjin |
42% |
Chongqing |
13% |
Wuhan |
3% |
Nanjing |
21% |
Hangzhou |
8% |
Chengdu |
-7% |
The
percentages above can be comprehended to mean that for every $100 invested
in a particular city-sector (sector being residential, office, and retail),
$X, where X is the percentage, positive or negative, indicated for that
city-sector. Hence, assuming we have EQUAL investments (say $100 each) in
ALL city-sectors listed above, then we can summarize the earnings into a)
the 1st tier group, namely Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, and
Shenzhen, and b) the 2nd tier group, i.e. the remaining 6 cities.
Here are the results:
Total
percentages: |
1st
tier cities |
2nd
tier cities |
Residential |
$143
earned for $400 input, or $36 per city |
$135
earned for $600 input, or $23 per city |
Office |
$103
ditto, or $26 per city |
$163
ditto, or $27 per city |
Retail |
$46
ditto, or $12 per city |
$79
ditto, or $13 per city |
Briefly, an
investor would have been better off investing in the 1st tier
residential sector from 2006 to 2007. For the office and retail sectors, the
2nd tier city group do offer better prospects though one has to
take into account that the 6 2nd tier cities are NOT the only
ones in China, and there are many more, and this would tend to make
investment selection, thus investment success, a higher calling.
Furthermore, the $earnings per city in the 1st tier group are not
much different from those in the 2nd tier group.
There is
reason for staying in and sticking to the 1st tier cities after all.
Important
points to note:
a) the above
price figures could be skewed toward the newly completed properties; b) the
calculations have not taken into account the transaction costs such as
taxes, fees etc; c) the 1 year trend from 2006 to 2007 may not be sufficient
statistically or reflective of future possibilities.
Notes:
The article and/or content contained herein are for general reference only
and are not meant to substitute for proper professional advice and/or due
diligence. The author(s) and Zeppelin, including its staff, associates,
consultants, executives and the like do not accept any responsibility or
liability for losses, damages, claims and the like arising out of the use or
reference to the content contained herein.
Back
to Home /
Back to Simple to Read Stuff
Section
|