A Dividend Economy
Stephen
Chung
Managing Director
Zeppelin
Real Estate Analysis Limited
July
2006
Most if not
all developed economies (and including some developing economies too) are
now having a graying population, largely the result of the baby-boomer
generation,
defined as those born after WWII from 1945 to 1960 or thereabouts, getting
old. The first batch of them has just crossed over the 60th year
old line. While projections vary from economy to economy, this baby-boomer
generation, of which your humble author also belongs, could constitute 20%
or more of the overall population in any one economy now or in some not too
distant future.
As such,
their economic and financial well-being, plus their health of course, can
insert a significant influence and impact on the economy as a whole.
Already many industries are targeting this group, ranging from health care,
insurance, mutual fund investment, and the like to tourism, sea-cruising,
pet care, hobby-building and so on. It is not just retirement and sitting at
home reading a book, but a sort of active lifestyle which could go on for
another 20 years after retirement from active work.
This
implies that this generation collectively not only lives longer and spends
more because of enhanced longevity than the previous generation, but also
spends more per capita than the previous generation
owing to
having a more active living style especially when health permits. This in
turn implies the need for a larger recurrent income stream than the earlier
generation to support such an active lifestyle. While to some such income
streams may still involve some active income from active work / business,
there are others who may wholly depend on passive investments to generate
such an income stream.
This leads
to the importance of recurrent income-generating capability of such passive
investments,
be they real estate, mutual funds, REITS, bonds, equities, currencies, and
the like. Readers at this point may wonder why the emphasis on recurrent
income, rather than investment asset (price / value) appreciation. The
answer is that we are not saying asset appreciation is not vital anymore,
but just that overall as people get older, they tend to prefer to enjoy life
and this means they would spend less attention on various investment markets
with a view to do overly numerous buying and selling decisions.
Hence,
while an actively working baby-boomer may spend more when his or her
investment assets grow in prices (feeling richer etc), he or she may not do
the same or spend as much when he or she is retired from active work and
thus an active income,
despite his or her investment having gone up in prices. On the contrary, he
or she may spend more when the recurrent income generated by the assets
increases. Naturally, one may always argue that assets can be liquidated for
cash (without reinvesting into other form of assets), but then again this
may work when one is 80 years of age, not when one is only 60 and can expect
to live another 20 years.
Not
being economists, it must be stated that the above hypothesis remains to be
observed.
Also, it is the first time that the global economy experiences such a huge
group of prospective retirees who are generally better off and more numerous
than their earlier generation. It brings not only opportunities but also
challenges i.e. when this generation can take care of itself in the
broadest sense of the phrase, all the better, if not, everyone would be in
deep trouble, and one gauge would be to observe their recurrent income
stream, a dividend-dependent generation so to speak.
Notes:
The article and/or content contained herein are for general reference only
and are not meant to substitute for proper professional advice and/or due
diligence. The author(s) and Zeppelin, including its staff, associates,
consultants, executives and the like do not accept any responsibility or
liability for losses, damages, claims and the like arising out of the use or
reference to the content contained herein.
Back
to Home /
Back
to Simple to Read Stuff Section
|