Hong Kong Residential: Do
Speculators Push Prices Up?
Stephen
Chung
Managing Director
Zeppelin
Real Estate Analysis Limited
August 2009
Many
people think that residential real estate speculators lead to higher prices
which in turn affect the affordability for many home-ownership aspirants. At
times, there have been calls for tighter rules and regulations to control
speculation.
Yet, is
this true?
Will residential prices be lower without speculators? Let¡¦s look at some
figures:
A)
Data
sources, methodology, and assumption
= data comes mainly from
www.centanet.com and includes looking at the percentage of confirmor
deals, affordability measure, average price, and the number of transactions.
The period dates from mid 1995 to June 2009.
Confirmor
deals are used as a proxy for real estate speculation because such deals are
common among speculators, although speculative real estate transactions can
also be done via other means e.g. company share transfers.
B)
From July
1995 to June 2009
= the
percentage of confirmor deals behaves in a volatile way, affordability
trends downward, average price remains stable with big fluctuations every
now and then, and the number of transactions resembles the confirmor pattern
[refer to the charts below].
Note the
affordability measure is an inverted figure, i.e. the higher the
percentages, the bigger the difficulties, sort of like a measure of how
difficult it is to be a homeowner. Its measures are based on certain
assumptions of household income, the mortgage level, and the mortgage rate.
C)
Speculators might have been influential on prices before the turn of the
century, but they matter little after 2000
= we have performed simple correlations among the various aspects mentioned
above [refer to the table below]. The higher the figures, the higher the
correlations although one must note that a high correlation by itself is not
conclusive of a cause-effect relation. There is always the chance for
coincidence.
¡@
Correlations between: |
|
Jul95-Jun09 |
Jul95-Dec00 |
Jan01-Jun09 |
Jan04-Jun09 |
Confirmors % |
Affordability % |
0.06 |
0.42 |
0.02 |
0.19 |
Confirmors % |
Average Price HK$ |
0.16 |
0.52 |
0.04 |
0.10 |
Confirmors % |
Transactions |
0.26 |
0.49 |
0.09 |
0.01 |
Affordability % |
Average Price HK$ |
0.49 |
0.67 |
0.75 |
0.30 |
Affordability % |
Transactions |
0.26 |
0.47 |
0.38 |
0.06 |
Average Price HK$ |
Transactions |
0.51 |
0.45 |
0.62 |
0.41 |
Essentially, speculation does not appear to exert much influence on
residential prices
during the
period from mid 1995 to mid 2009, or for that matter, after 2000, even if
only the last 5 years from 2004 are counted [the red-color figures indicate
not only a low correlation, but also opposite direction].
The only
period when speculation appears to exert a probably significant influence
dates from
mid 1995 to the end of 2000, and speculation (as reflected by the percentage
of confirmor deals) correlates significantly not just with average prices
[seemingly the more speculation, the higher the price], but also with the
affordability measure [more speculation, less affordability or higher degree
of difficulty in homeownership], and the number of transactions [more
speculation, more transactions].
D)
Affordability depends on prices mostly
= stating
the obvious, the higher the prices, the lower the affordability, and vice
versa. However, do note that the correlation between affordability and
average price drops to the lowest in recent years (0.30) versus the one for
the full period (0.49), 2000 or prior (0.67), and 2000 or after (0.75).
Perhaps
this has something to do with the recent comparatively low mortgage rates
i.e. despite the average prices being not overly remote from that of the
1997 peak, the lower mortgage rates have made homeownership easier (to
afford).
And lower
mortgage (financing) rates have to do with cheap capital and liquidity¡Kwhich
in turn lead to...(think and have fun filling in the blank)¡K¡K
Summing
up, what or who has been causing residential price rises in recent years?
Definitely not the speculators but this does not mean lower market risks!
Notes:
The article and/or content contained herein are for general reference only
and are not meant to substitute for proper professional advice and/or due
diligence. The author(s) and Zeppelin, including its staff, associates,
consultants, executives and the like do not accept any responsibility or
liability for losses, damages, claims and the like arising out of the use or
reference to the content contained herein.
Back
to Home /
Back
to Simple to Read Stuff Section
|