There Is NO High Or Low Land
Price Policy
Stephen Chung
Managing Director
Zeppelin Real Estate Analysis Limited
October
2004
Recently government land auctions appeared to have brought in some
rather good (high) prices for land, thus sparking (again) in the some
quarters that the government has gone back to using a high land price
policy. However, your humble author tends to see it this way: while the
prices fetched are high (by recent years¡¦ standard anyway), this does
not follow that there is a high land price policy. What the government
does is that it is selling its land like any private-market landowner
does and that is to seek the highest bid for its assets, in short a
market-based behavior though in some ways intentionally or
unintentionally the government may via various urban planning and
building regulations render the land cost a significant portion in real
estate prices (but this is another story for another day or readers may
go read our past article for clues =
http://www.real-estate-tech.com/articles/Ret0799d1.pdf). Whether
this inclination is a good thing or a bad idea economically, socially,
administratively, taxation-wise, and the like remains a debate for
academics and experts.
In any
event, the high land price argument is technically questionable and here is
why:
a)
Ultimately
it is the purchasers¡¦ pool that determines the prices of real estate
= if one feels that real estate prices are utterly high, one simply refuses
to purchase. If sufficient number of potential buyers feel the same way,
real estate prices are unlikely to shoot up significantly, and vice versa.
This also involves the particular ¡¥one¡¦ investor¡¦s confidence in him/herself
and whether his or her market views eventually prove true. Confident
investors tend not to follow the crowd provided they feel their investment
views would hold true ultimately. The point here is IF the market is so
easily manipulated, it deserves to be manipulated = don¡¦t blame anyone else
or any policy for that matter.
b)
High land
prices do NOT lead to high real estate prices
= while land prices (costs to the developers-landowners) are a significant
factor in gauging whether a real estate project will procure a profit, the
prices that the completed property can be sold bear little reference to the
production factors including land cost. Real estate prices relate more to
economic performance and earning power. IMPORTANT HYPOTHESIS = even
if the government gives out land for free, real estate prices will still be
more or less at the level they are. The reason is simple, if I were a real
estate developer, and I know that the average real estate purchaser can
afford HK$X to purchase a home, why should I charge (much) less than HK$X
just because I have obtained the land for free? I would simply pocket the
sum that might have been paid for the land unless the government restricts
the real estate prices that can be charged to buyers in the land lease terms
and conditions.
c)
Not buying
real estate or NOT being a homeowner is NOT life-threatening
= your humble author does think that most people would benefit from buying
their own home, yet does not see this as a must in one¡¦s life journey. Nor
does he deem it necessary in case one wishes to marry and form a family,
what¡¦s wrong with just renting? Provided one¡¦s financial planning is well
done, there may not be a need to own (much) real estate.
d)
One can
also participate in real estate via funds or REIT
= though the latter has yet to be seen in Hong Kong, these exist in other
parts of the world and could be an alternative to owning real estate direct.
The higher
real estate prices seen in Hong Kong has more to do with our having a GDP
per capita of US$23,000 (comparable to most western countries such as
Canada, Australia etc), a general keenness for making money and investment,
and perhaps a cultural inclination for real estate / land. The last thing
that drives up real estate prices is a government initiated policy.
Notes:
The article and/or content contained herein are for general reference only
and are not meant to substitute for proper professional advice and/or due
diligence. The author(s) and Zeppelin, including its staff, associates,
consultants, executives and the like do not accept any responsibility or
liability for losses, damages, claims and the like arising out of the use or
reference to the content contained herein.
Back
to Home /
Back to Simple to Read Stuff Section
|